Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 5441 - 5460
of 6,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
PA: Need to secure a vehicle for officer safety does not require that the officer actually see a gun
15 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:29 pm
By Rob Hofmann The Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) has reaffirmed the judicial trend to give great deference to the terms of an executed real property purchase agreement as written, emphatically stating that the pre-litigation mediation provision at issue in Lange v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
Davis (on which I posted earlier), I'd say that this term had been an unmitigated disaster for state spending power. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
The State - Homeless Sex Offender ChallengeBelow this message are a couple articles about the case that was argued in the Georgia Supreme Court this past Monday, Santos V. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:01 pm
Second, it contest the way that most federal courts interpret and apply Hazelwood v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
And Kansas courts have prohibited inconsistent verdicts in bench trials, see State v. [read post]
Randolph does not give a potential defendant veto power over a search where he has to be asked first
7 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Davis Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0388n.06 2008/07/01 USA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Davis Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0388n.06 2008/07/01 USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Woodill v Parke Davis & Co., 402 N.E.2d 194 (Ill. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
The court drew an analogy to Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:07 pm
Or in any published or unpublished judicial decision in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:43 pm
In arguing that Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
” The opinion noted that the Supreme Court, after creating a Bivens damages remedy for federal officials’ violations of an individual’s Fourth Amendment rights, had only exended that remedy to two kinds of claims: unequal treatment in federal employment (Davis v. [read post]
