Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5441 - 5460 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma concurred with the initial panel decision of the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
”Id. at *8, *14.Judicial DisqualificationIn Liljeberg, the Supreme Court first held that [a] district court judge violated 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
’”  The district court agreed.The TTAB didn’t use the same multifactor test as the district court, which would use the judicial standard (viewing the marks in the marketplace, not side by side in a vacuum). [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
As stated by the Court of Appeals in Alejandro, this third requirement is also known as the prima facie case requirement. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause, the United States Supreme Court first asks whether the asserted individual interests are encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of life, liberty or property. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:13 pm by Noura Erakat
The Department of State (DOS) submitted a Statement of Interest to the Court urging it to not hear the case. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Julie Deisher
The ruling comes just days after the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana [official website] became the first federal court to uphold a state's ban on same-sex marriage [JURIST report] since the Supreme Court's verdict in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, the appeals court first found that the Supreme Court’s decision in McKennon v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
  The Eighth Circuit held it had jurisdiction, granted the Defendants’ petition to appeal the remand orders, vacated the District Court’s orders remanding the cases to the state court and instructed the District Court to proceed consistent with its opinion. [read post]