Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 61,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Finally the 2017 Congress did, indeed, zero out the payment amount, but that doesn't mean that option in Subsection 5000A(b)--pay $0--is "still a tax. [read post]
Justices reverse Wisconsin court ruling that increased majority-Black districts in state legislature
23 Mar 2022, 6:34 pm
The ruling in Grothman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
Engle v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:08 am
Utility Consumers’ Action Network v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:14 am
In doing so, it adopted language from Patel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:38 am
It was not until the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
Nagel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
Here are the discussion questions for United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am
Code, literally means ‘described in. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:32 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently weighed in on this further in Lam v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:37 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The ECJ today handed down a case in a landmark decision regarding data protection and the Internet (Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court held that ZIP codes are “personal identification information” within the meaning of the state’s Song Beverly Credit Card Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 6:25 am
"From "High-stakes case about pigs/National Pork Producers v. [read post]
