Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 11,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Fowler, 2007 BCSC 1678, Madam Justice Holmes stated: [34] In Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:53 am
In October 2011, thousands of them wanted to cross the bridge into Prospect Park in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:21 am
In the case of Bereznicki v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
” In the California Lawyer, Traci Park anticipates the Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
Fabian v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 6:41 am
The verdict has now been affirmed in Bonano v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:08 am
Oral argument was held Wednesday in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
In a judgment handed down on 23 September 2014 (Moran v Schwartz Publishing [2014] WASC 334) Kenneth Martin J accepted that there did exist facts which comprised reasonable grounds to suspect the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:44 am
On Feb. 10, Houston’s Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued Brazos Presbyterian Homes d/b/a The Hallmark v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am
An Appeals Panel agreed and Seabright sought judicial review; a Starr County District Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of Maximina, and the 4th DCA upheld that decision last year.Seabright then asked the Texas Supreme Court to review - all the while, I presume, holding on to the death benefit money.Seabrights novel argument is that since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Leordeanu v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm
Mason Brandstedter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
On 16 February 2015, HHJ Parkes QC handed down judgment in the libel case of Rai v Bholowasia [2015] EWHC B2 (QB) (heard 19-23, and 26 to 27 January 2015). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 233, 240 [1984]; Matter of Adirondack Council, Inc. v Adirondack Park Agency, 92 AD3d 188, 191 [2012]; Matter of Wal-Mart Stores v Campbell, 238 AD2d 831, 832-833 [1997]). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 233, 240 [1984]; Matter of Adirondack Council, Inc. v Adirondack Park Agency, 92 AD3d 188, 191 [2012]; Matter of Wal-Mart Stores v Campbell, 238 AD2d 831, 832-833 [1997]). [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:17 pm
As to the issue of notice, even though the notice given here did not state that the proposed ordinance would repeal Local Law No. 2 (1970) of the Town of Clifton Park, the notice did state that the proposed ordinance would amend the zoning ordinance in relation to two business districts and identified the geographical area that would be affected, which included the CCA parcel. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
