Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 5,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 8:19 am
LEXIS 99981, at *51.Woah -- I guess the Judge is unaware of the mild hand-wringing that occasioned Yale Law Professor Harold Koh's nomination to serve as legal advisor to the State Department or Justice Sotomayor's comments on "foreign law" (she actually said Justices Scalia and Thomas had a point).Old Europe and Emily Dickinson, all in one order -- that must have been one nice Valentine's Day. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:39 am
Gore or last month's Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
Mexico's attorney general has challenged the law in the Supreme Court.Public debates"Same-Sex Marriage: State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The attack on shareholders’ rights comes in the form of claims, voiced by Justice Stevens in his interminably long dissent, by Justice Sotomayor at oral argument, and by numerous liberal commentators, that corporations really have no rights, since they are “creatures of the state. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
Take Monday's short-as-can-be decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
See also Daniels v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The Court applied the New Jersey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
Virginia, noting that the interim addition of Justice Sotomayor to the Court evidently did not cause the Court to reconsider its decision last Term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm
The only notable lower court decision is State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am
The Supreme Court of the United States tells the government that the Confrontation Clause does still exist. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:24 am
Shell Oil Products Co. and Shell Oil Products Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
Massachussetts, which held the State had to use a live witness to admit lab reports. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am
Here’s the 9th District’s recitation of the facts in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:13 pm
Below, Tiffany Cartwright, a student at Stanford Law School, analyzes the opinion in Wood v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:09 am
During oral argument in Berghuis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
