Search for: "THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION" Results 5441 - 5460 of 18,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2020, 7:35 am by David Oxenford and Adam Sandler
The Federal Communications Commission will carefully review any petition for rulemaking filed by the Department of Commerce. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:40 am by Jon Brodkin
(credit: Getty Images | Bloomberg) Republican Brendan Carr of the Federal Communications Commission is cheering on President Trump's attack on Big Tech this week. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
President Trump on Thursday, May 28, signed an executive order targeting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that protects tech companies from being held liable for third-party content shared on their sites. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
President Trump on Thursday, May 28, signed an executive order targetting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that provides tech companies from being held liable for third-party content shared on their sites. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:34 am by INFORRM
The order focuses on an important piece of legislation: section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 1996. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
” The petitions of the week are below the jump: Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:37 am
The White House will submit such complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Richard Burr, whose own stock sales have drawn scrutiny from the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
IN THE NEWS President Trump signed an executive order declaring his “commitment to free and open debate on the internet” and calling for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to petition the Federal Communications Commission for a proposed rulemaking that could potentially limit certain legal protections enjoyed by social media companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But Trump repeatedly has argued they allow Facebook, Google and Twitter to censor conservatives with impunity — charges these companies deny….The order signed Thursday encourages the Federal Communications Commission to rethink the scope of Section 230 and when its liability protections apply. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  Note that unless required by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), a state-approved OSHA plan (e.g. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm by Daphne Keller
Changes like this have long been contemplated as part of ordinary intermediary liability law -- for example in the European Commission’s 2012 Notice and Action proceeding. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:25 pm by David Greene
” Even though neither the statute nor court opinions that interpret it mush these two Section 230 provisions together, the order asks the Federal Communications Commission to start a rulemaking and consider linking the two provision's liability shields. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It directs executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission to study whether they can place new regulations on the companies — though experts express doubts much can be done without an act of Congress. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:55 pm by Cory Doctorow
Queer people who don't know anyone who is out can find online communities to help them understand and develop their own identities. [read post]
The FCC’s rules establish a base fine of $10,000 for operation without a license or other authorization from the Commission. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:00 am
Sexual harassment is a type of sex-based employment discrimination that violates both federal and state law. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:35 am by Jon L. Gelman
Like the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), the federal government would serve as a backstop to maintain marketplace stability and to share the burden alongside private industry. [read post]