Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 5441 - 5460 of 34,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:26 pm
While this case has hit the papers, it probably is worth taking a look at the District Court's opinion, dismissing the indictment for outrageous government conduct, in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:02 pm
Like New Year's resolutions which remain unfulfilled, a decision late last year of a federal district court sent still another reminder that copyright law in the United States remains far from the formality free regime envisioned by Berne Convention rules. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A 1982, opinion from the 14th District Court of Appeals styled, Parchman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Top Cop Shop, Inc., supra (“The December 5, 2024 amended order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case No. 4:24–cv–478, is stayed”). [6] Smith v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts May 5, 2016); United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-9540, grant limited to the first question raised). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
General Motors Corp., 542 F.2d 445, 452-53 (7th Cir. 1976); United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:43 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, a subsequent joint rule limited the section’s geographic scope to the United States and the high seas. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am by Tom Goldstein
The district court ruled for the plaintiff on the first, broadest argument. [read post]