Search for: "United States v. Herring"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 23,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Section 10 demonstrates the goodwill of Parliament that Parliament can and will function to protect the interests of each part of the United Kingdom, even in the absence of meaningful representation in Westminster. 11:25: Ronan Lavery QC says absence of consideration of NI in these circumstances is gross. 11:21:& [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:03 am
United States Jaycees, Sex Discrimination, and the First Amendment, Fordham Law Review Vol. 87 , p.... [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
When that was unsuccessful, Midland subsequently made a request to the United States Supreme Court to review the decision of the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
When that was unsuccessful, Midland subsequently made a request to the United States Supreme Court to review the decision of the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:22 am
” Heckler v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:33 pm
Government in its Samsung v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court famously struck down the federal civil rights remedy for physical harassment and sexual assault in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm
United States, in which the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts is pervaded by an argument that the statute, read in the context from which it arose, was "about" something. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
New Mexico, though, just rejected that rule a couple of weeks ago (in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
The case is the United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
For example, the government argues that ending DACA would discourage the flow of undocumented migrants to the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
United States, Timbs v. [read post]
