Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
As my description above suggests, however, I don't read his opinion as indicating that it's necessary to invoke property law, or that Party A's "positive legal right" to Party B's confidentiality might not arise from some other legal source, such as a statute or, most importantly, a confidentiality agreement. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
The second benefit of using percentages of net wealth or net value is that a defen-dant's wealth won't be used to affect the jury's decision-making. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
Laws don’t get tossed easily. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:19 am
Or maybe it's because their world has become their memes; the funny joke has replaced social norms as the true glue of society.Kevin O'Keefe asked a question yesterday, Don’t law schools have an obligation to teach law students how to use the Internet? [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
So far, we've never encountered a judge who agreed, particularly because the 1988 case, Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
And the states probably don't even have standing. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" Prelogar responded, "We don't think dangerousness is the standard with law-abiding, and I recognize you might have some different views on that, Justice Barrett. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
Not that it's easy, or even possible, but that we don't move forward by ignoring or denying problems. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 5:38 am
During the actual simulation, quoting a real statement Bulger made to law enforcement, Sullivan said, I don't want to be placed in a prison cell with a bunch of [n-word]s. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
First we have video of Mr. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:20 pm
You have to be nuts to take on the state in virtually any case, so don't do it mildly! [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
But the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that incorrect advice on matters that are collateral to the criminal case don't make out a case of ineffective assistance under the Supreme Court's Strickland v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
The result is a good one: copyright owners don’t lose their ability to defend legitimate infringement claims because of inadvertent mistakes made on their registration application. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 9:00 pm
DON';T' GET INVOLVED IN POLITICS UNLESS THE PURPOSE IS PURELY ALTRUISTIC. [read post]
15 Jun 2025, 11:42 am
At some point, they need certainty that they won't be sued for past conduct. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 5:48 pm
I don't many - if any - of them filled out their own paperwork. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
I don't know if anyone reasonably believes that email subject lines which offer free products (for example: "Review & Keep Designer Handbags worth $1500 Dollars-guys invited too") actually offer free products. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:39 am
While the law's poor drafting makes it a litigator's dream, we don't expect a lot of litigation interpreting it. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:51 pm
But a dismissal is as good as an acquittal from the defendant's point of view, because it results in no conviction.So my interlocutor was not only wrong, I was too -- we were both too generous to the prosecution. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
They don't have discretion to make up false allegations, lie under oath, and doctor evidence. [read post]
