Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 68,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
The constitutionality of DSPE Act has been already upheld by the Supreme Court in Advance Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Lord Hamblen neatly summaries this position at [57] stating: “In summary, the certification provision should be interpreted as being conclusive as to the service charge “sum payable by the tenant” but not as to the underlying liability for the service charge. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm
Lawyers and non-lawyers may or may not recognize the case of Snyder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:32 pm
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
At the trial the defendant objected to his driving abstract being admitted into evidence. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
Mr Gourlay also argues that a court, being neutral, would not normally have anything called “a litigation strategy”. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
The only support plan was the care of her parents who were not in favour of her being allowed home. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
In the recent case of Golnick v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
Young and Rubicam Group of Companies and Stevens v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
Young and Rubicam Group of Companies and Stevens v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
Young and Rubicam Group of Companies and Stevens v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:48 am
Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
United States v. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Yesterday, I wrote about the doctrine that “state action” is immune from federal antitrust law, a doctrine that dates back to the Parker v. [read post]
