Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 5461 - 5480 of 21,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
By Livia Solaro While cultural heritage disputes have often proved heralds of international tensions, very few cases have caused quite the stir as the one revolving around Victorious Youth, a rare example of a life-size bronze statue from the classical Greek period. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
As onlookers pass by, the officer may “‘feel with sensitive fingers every portion of [your] body. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:14 pm by Venkat
Several courts have said as much in the defamation context (see DiMeo v Max, Finkel v Dauber, and more recently, Sandals Resorts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:24 am by David Hart QC
Bruton v IC and The Duchy of Cornwall & The Attorney General to HRH the Prince of Wales (EA/2010/0182)    3 November 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
 A number of other bodies were interested in knowing the outcome as well as future employers of the claimant’s services. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Judge reviewed an extensive body of contemporaneous communications between the parties to try to ascertain whether the defendant knew her allegations to be false. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It is a similarly simple piece of legislation, which has three basic purposes: to allow individuals to enforce their ECHR rights in our domestic courts, to require public bodies to respect ECHR rights, and to require parliament to check that any new legislation is compatible with the ECHR. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:59 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.801(d)(2)(E) provides that a statement is not hearsay if The statement is offered against a party and is...a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of... [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:55 pm by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
In addition, granting the PRA an express power to remove members of the management body of institutions and holding companies; and amendments to the list of entities exempted from CRD V. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:15 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Supreme Court in the foundational Piper Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:45 pm
 At some point, for whatever reason, the old man pulls his arms underneath his body. [read post]