Search for: "C. M. v. State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 6,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
I’m pretty sure I know how Benjamin Cardozo would have ruled. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:34 am by Stephen Bilkis
In passing this bill, one trial judge wrote, "the introducer's memorandum in support noted that domestic violence must be viewed as a video as opposed to a snapshot.' "Because family offenses have no specified statute of limitations, courts have had to evaluate each case individually to determine if a delay in filing would prevent the purposes of the act from being carried out" (Jose M. v Tatianna T., 30 Misc 3d 948 [FamCt Albany County 2011]; see also… [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:46 pm by TDot
State are now part of the Legal Eagle family. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
Trump announces that he will not run** or will no longer run for the Presidency of the United States of America in the current U.S. presidential election cycle“] you promise and agree not to assist or counsel, directly or indirectly, for compensation or as a volunteer, any person that is a candidate or exploring candidacy for President of the United States other than Mr. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Judge stopped father's evidence, stating that he had failed to show cause to support a change of residence. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)   US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 7:06 pm
The notice must: (A) state the time and place of the trial; (B) allow the defendant a reasonable time to prepare a defense; and (C) state the essential facts constituting the charged criminal contempt and describe it as such [read post]