Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 13,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Principal appealed the Supreme Court's decision.The Appellate Division, explaining that the "limited issue" it was whether the subpoena ad testificandum issued in the pending SED administrative decertification matter was properly quashed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Lindsey v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:50 am
Fote v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
1 Office Depot, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:40 am
Matthews v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
Leon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
The Supreme Court had found a violation in the Patent Trial Appeals Board’s staffing by administrative patent judges, who are inferior officers. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:57 am
Early intervention counseling Tatum v Horn, 37 AD3d 285 Wayne Tatum appealed his dismissal from his position as a New York City correction office after being found guilty of a number of allegations of misconduct. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:10 pm
Instead, most decisions under Part VII carried a right to administrative review, with appeal to the County Court on a point of law. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:10 pm
Instead, most decisions under Part VII carried a right to administrative review, with appeal to the County Court on a point of law. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:44 am
Police chief held to have qualified immunity with respect to First Amendment violation allegationsGubitosi v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
" Again, these should be dull but are laugh-out-loud funny: "Because of a small glitch in the administration of the oath of office," he wrote in 2008, "the Chief Justice inadvertently swore in Barack Hussein Obama as a third-class Webelo in lower Montgomery County's Den 307. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
In New Zealand, the Supreme Court Act 2003 restricts the number of judges in that Court to six, but in fact the decision was taken administratively to have only five permanent judges, apparently on the theory that every permanent judge should have the “right” to sit on every case. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgments in actions for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Gabriela Arteaga v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 12:41 pm
In American Express Co. v. [read post]
