Search for: "DOE v. Smith" Results 5461 - 5480 of 6,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
However, a similar clause does not appear in the new Bill. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Oregon, the Supreme Court concluded that the Sixth Amendment required that juries convict by a unanimous vote, but concluded that this requirement does not apply to the states; accordingly, a state criminal defendant may lawfully be convicted based on (for example) a 9-3 vote. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 6:21 am by INFORRM
On the same day Kerr J handed down judgment in the case of Enaholo v Totally plc [2024] EWHC 3249 (KB). [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
   The law of libel is a very blunt instrument for dealing with this but it does provide some degree of restraint. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by John Mikhail
DOJ might have relied on Schuck and Smith when appealing to “consent” in this fashion, but in any case, its quotation from Elk v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]