Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5461 - 5480 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
[Morgan] asserts that he and [Preston] separated `on or about July 6, 2012,’ following which [she] filed for divorce on July 20, 2012. . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:44 pm by Robichaud
So what does it cost already for a lawyer to defend someone on criminal charges? [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:44 pm by Robichaud
So what does it cost already for a lawyer to defend someone on criminal charges? [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
We want to rein in the NSA, but we also wax outraged when the intelligence community does not connect the dots. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Third, an admission of liability by the defendant does not waive the issue of contributory negligence. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
” Id. at *7 (internal citations omitted).Rule 20“[However, because] Rule 21 does not provide a standard for district courts to apply in deciding whether parties or claims are misjoined … ‘courts have looked to Rule 20 for guidance. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 3:35 pm
 In her view, though, a bigger barrier than practitioner inexperience, whether it exists or not, is the likelihood that defendants will routinely challenge the validity of the registered design]. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
In an appeal from a bench trial, findings of facts are needed, and the request for those is due before the notice of appeal itself is due: 20 days from the date of the judgment. -- > Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Refusing to let a Muslim employee conduct prayers in a lobby used by other businesses, in the HR director’s office, or in a hallway, did not violate Title VII where the defendants offered to let him pray off-site each day as he already did on Fridays and his suggestions would cause undue hardship, found a federal district court in Kansas, granting summary judgment for the defendants (Farah v A-1 Careers, November 20, 2013, Crow, S). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
  The regulation does so for good reason. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
This said, the judge quickly considered the two last requirements of Section 97A CDPA and concluded that (1) both users and the operators of the websites in issue used the Defendants' services to infringe the Claimants' copyrights, and (2) the Defendants had actual knowledge that users and the operators of the Websites use the Defendants' services to infringe copyright. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The wording of Art. 27 para. 1 Brussels I Regulation does not provide for an exception in cases where the court second seised has exclusive jurisdiction under Art. 22 Brussel I Regulation. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Prost, Bryson, O'Malley)BackgroundLegal Standard: Permanent InjunctionIn accordance with the principles of equity, a plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction “must demonstrate: (1)that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2)that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is… [read post]