Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 5,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
What I have heard is that he does the Court's work with a high level of energy and that he does a good job discerning and applying the law.I have no knowledge of the particulars of the complaint against Judge Shull that has been reported in the newspapers. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:37 am
If Judge Mukasey does in fact believe the president can disregard federal statutes in the kind of cases described above, it makes no difference whether the otherwise valid statute is said to "become unconstitutional" in these cases (on the ground that it impinges on Article II) or whether instead the president is simply said to be constitutionally supreme (vis-a-vis Congress) on matters that fall within his commander-in-chief power. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
Here is a case that teaches California criminal defense lawyers to always try to negotiate reduction of a felony to a misdemeaor after a length of successful probation, or just go and ask the court at the end of probation. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Second, the attorney general's brief, published on the Law Journal's Web site, contains as its third point, "Changes in Insurance Offered by Judiciary Do Not Violate Article VI, Section 25(a) . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
[www.nlrb.gov] The Board, in a 3-2 decision, held that the filing and maintenance of a reasonably based lawsuit does not violate the National Labor Relations Act, regardless of the motive for bringing the suit. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:36 am
[The notice also] clarifies the "one more" continuing application provision, and states that the meaning of "examined" does not include PCT examination for purposes of one rule. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:44 pm
At the same time, however, the Clause reinforces the original understanding that Congress could limit the - President's - power to deploy military force domestically, a conclusion that could have significant implications vis-a-vis contemporary debates over inherent executive authority in the war on terrorism.Recommended! [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
RIVERA WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL AND POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDING DUE TO JUDGE FERRIS'S BIAS AND PREDETERMINATION OF THE ISSUES CONTRARY TO THE SIXTH, EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS. .................. 26 ARGUMENT VI MR. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
My verdict on Ontario's MMP Referendum is now in.The Top Line I will be voting against the Ontario MMP proposal in the October 10, 2007 Provincial Referendum. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:08 am
· In Counts II, IV and VI, the common law tort claims, Office Depot alleges that two Marsh senior vice presidents and a Marsh managing director who were… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
My firm does/does not have a mandatory retirement policy. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
VI, cl. 2. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Amendment VI, as interpreted in, among other cases, Scott v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:19 am
" Both organizations have been raising money for the singular purpose of getting things back to the way they used to be vis a vis the court appointment system. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:05 pm
And when it does, may it be, finally, the last battle of the American Revolution. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 3:16 pm
I've just finished listening to Volume VI in this series, a 4-CD set. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
We suppose that means that a failure to meet projections doesn't amount to a CMAE unless the "underlying" cause of the failure does. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:23 am
If such conduct does not qualify, the . . .statute is over-inclusive on its face. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:53 am
Furthermore, the court stated that the letters sent by Eran were "particularly scurrilous, accusatory and threatening" and "the timing of the action vis-Ã -vis the termination of the former employees invites an inference of retaliatory motive. [read post]
