Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 12,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm
The Article 29 Working Party, in its working document interpreting Article 26(1), considers that such an interpretation is unlikely as the concept of an employment contract can be interpreted so broadly, as there is no direct and objective link between performance of an employment contract and such a transfer of data (WP 114 at 14). [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:20 am
July 29, 2022). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
Frenette, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 647, 89 D.L.R. (4th) 653, at p. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
LEXIS 9651, 2007 WL 1224616, *1 (7th Cir. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
In her testimony, Thomas reiterated under oath that she does not talk to her husband about her political activities and he does not discuss his work on the court. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 3:16 pm
Specifically, section 11(c) states: No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this Act. 29 U.S.C. section 660(c)(1). [read post]
4 May 2021, 10:11 am
But that: (1) does not tell us whether any constitutional amendment other than the thirteenth might be “absolute;” and (2) certainly does not mean that the protection against slavery and involuntary servitude apart from punishment imposed for a criminal conviction is anything other than absolute. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:05 pm
Jan. 29, 2008). [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Defendant does, however, cite Cash v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
The State does not agree with this position. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
[1] U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
(Id. at 28- 29.) [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
The results (if we were to use an analogy from sports) are: 2 to 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The opinion does not reveal whether either one of the two billings statements actually evidences any card use to support the theory of contract-formation by account utilization. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
On February 1, 2012, it filed a second expert opinion by Prof. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:01 pm
1) Grant Farred, "Secret Racism Underlying Lacrosse Case," Herald-Sun, October 29, 2006. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
Towers Watson & Co., 2021 WL 4555188, at *13 & n. 29. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 29, Rep. [read post]
3 May 2020, 1:54 pm
An object does not exist--or at least it is not recognizable, until it is given meaning and thus "meaningful" can then be placed within the constellation of a reality in which objects can be understood in relation to each other. [read post]
