Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 5461 - 5480 of 76,265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Donnelly L. McDowell
The ANPR uses the term “junk fees” to refer to “unfair or deceptive fees that are charged for goods or services that have little or no added value to the consumer, including goods or services that consumers would reasonably assume to be included within the overall advertised price. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:32 am by Rick Hasen
With news that the North Carolina Supreme Court has flipped to Republican control, there is a good chance that the this court’s holding that partisan gerrymandering violates the state constitution will be overturned. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am by Blake E. Reid
But the only case Goldin relies on is a 1942 appellate case, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:52 am by Laurence H. Tribe
But what once may have worked – and indeed, we ourselves proposed a Special Counsel last winter – is no longer a good idea, as one of us (Tribe) tweeted immediately after the idea was floated earlier this month. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:56 pm by Kurt R. Karst
If you have a good relationship with the review team, Dr. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
    As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
Vans argues that Rogers is distinguishable because that case did not involve infringing trade dress used to sell goods that compete with the trademark owner’s goods. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supreme Court held that New York's prior gun laws were unconstitutional.The case is Antonyuk v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am by Aaron Moss
He may look like a rat, but he’s a good looking rat, no? [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]