Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 6,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
On appeal, the Superior Court upheld the ruling, citing Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Criminal Procedural Law § 210.20(g) states in pertinent part that after arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof upon the ground that the defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:33 am
A class action was superior to other methods of adjudicating the claims, in the court's view. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Constitutional Law ACORN Granted Preliminary Injunction on Punitive Legislation Claimed Unconstitutional Bill of Attainder ACORN v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:22 am
Superior Court, 80 Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
Granted, vesting the power of fiat in the board of directors raises legitimate accountability concerns. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:14 pm
On December 17, 2009, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Peter D. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:35 am
Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:14 am
(Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco) Ecast, a former client of MoFo, sued the firm for malpractice. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
One parent may be granted the right to move away with the child. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:12 am
No. 4158, October 8, 2009, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, H.M. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
(Norden v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Since 2003 this log jam has produced an increasing number of legal challenges through the arduous process of habeas corpus petitions to the superior court where the prison sits, and eventually to the California Supreme Court, and on to the federal courts (where dreaded ATEDPA issues rear their heads). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Accordingly, the Court will, albeit reluctantly, grant injunctive relief as discussed above. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
Four days later, the court granted ZymoGenetics’ motion to dissolve the TROs. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
The term ‘superior court of jurisdiction’ did not of itself define which courts were susceptible to judicial review and which were not. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:38 am
” The case is Kinses v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
SUPERIOR COURT DECISIONS IN POST-KOKEN CASE ON VENUE O'Hara v. [read post]
