Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 5461 - 5480 of 16,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Can you do what the Framers imagined and hoped (against hope) United States’ leaders would do: serve the people and the higher good? [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Danielle Citron, Helen Norton
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Larry
The important legal and possibly philosophical question to be answered in Mondelez Global LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Finally, no project sponsor or lender reacts well to legal uncertainty, and at present, there is likely no other jurisdiction in the United States or its territories with more legal uncertainty than Puerto Rico. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Ohio (1961), applying the exclusionary rule to the states; Gideon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
For example, the sheriff claimed the employee submitted false work hours while attending the state law enforcement academy. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]