Search for: "In re F. E." Results 5461 - 5480 of 7,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In that year, Congress enacted section 68(f) and section 151(d)(3)(E) to provide for, yes, a phasing out of the phase-outs, and also enacted section 68(g) and section 151(d)(3)(F) to provide for complete elimination of these two phase-outs for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.After too many years dealing with these, to use the words of Rep. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Robins Co., 734 F.2d 676 (11th Cir. 1984)). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) (Update: Pleased to see that the Journal has appended the following correction to the online edition:)An earlier version of this story mistakenly reported that the Obama Administration is sending Additional Protocol 1 for Senate ratification. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:58 am by Gilles Cuniberti
A French public law entity (Inserm) entered into a contract with a Norwegian Fondation (Letten F. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm by Kelly
Having a check made payable to you opens the door for timing and other issues if you’re not careful (and sadly, occasionally, even when you are). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
In re American Express Financial Advisors Securities Litig., Civil Action No. 1-04-cv-1773 (S.D.N.Y.). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
L'Opposante était représentée en première par instance par un mandataire C. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:29 pm by Brandon L. Spurlock
  Relying upon In Re American Express Merchant's Litigation, 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009) ("Amex"), the District Court found E&Y's class waiver provision unenforceable on the grounds that enforcing the provision would preclude Plaintiff from vindicating her statutory rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:29 pm by Brandon L. Spurlock
Relying upon In Re American Express Merchant's Litigation, 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009) ("Amex"), the District Court found E&Y's class waiver provision unenforceable on the grounds that enforcing the provision would preclude Plaintiff from vindicating her statutory rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:05 am by Rick Kabra
A) Real estate transaction funds, such as a down payment on a house B) Personal injury settlements C) Earned fees D) Personal funds E) Operating funds F) Collections G) Other settlements or judgments H) Retainers and advances The answer is A, B, F, G, and maybe H—depending on whether you’ve earned the advances or not. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
They're asking a Congress that annually REDUCES the IRS budget. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:29 pm by Sylvain Métille
Nous allons donc essayer de présenter de manière simple une situation plutôt compliquée. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 2, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Country Music Association, Inc., Serial Nos. 78906900 and 78901341 [Section 2(e)(1) refusals of COUNTRY MUSIC ASSOCIATION and CMA COUNTRY MUSIC ASSOCIATION & Design for "Association services, namely, promoting country music, and promoting the interests of country music entertainers and the country music recording industry," on the ground of mere… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:19 pm by Dean Gonsowski
” In terms of the remedy for the government’s failure, she did cut them some slack:  “Because no metadata was specifically requested in Plaintiffs’ July 23 e-mail, and because this is an issue of first impression, I will not require Defendants to re-produce all of the records with metadata. [read post]