Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 6,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
Caroline Lucas, the Green Party MP for Brighton Pavilion, Green Party member Jenny Jones, and George Galloway, the former MP for Bradford West, have brought the legal challenge in the IPT. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
” Grako v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
At stake are all 435 seats in the House of Representatives, 36 Senate spots, 36 governorships, dozens of ballot measures and approximately 6,000 state legislator posts. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
Supreme Court enunciated in Morrison v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
Jones, 2009 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
State AG offices HAT [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the case of R v Jones [2006] UKHL 16, which involved defendants causing various forms of damage to military infrastructure in order to prevent the war in Iraq in 2003: … when Parliament speaks of a person being entitled to use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances, the court must, in judging what is reasonable, take into account the reason why the state claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:54 am
Cyprus v. [read post]
