Search for: "John Doe, Inc." Results 5461 - 5480 of 5,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2007, 7:35 pm
There is common ownership with an RIA, Family Wealth Management Services, Inc, a Tennesee corporation. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:24 pm
"And so, the Board constitutionally affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
"In conclusion, the Board found the mark to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and it affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:36 am
"]February 15, 2007 - 2 PM: Airflite, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 11:58 pm
[Part 2 of this two-part posting will appear tomorrow.]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
Neuro Vasx, Inc., 67 USPQ2d 1205 (TTAB 2003) [fraud found where registrant had not used the mark on one of two goods identified], and that Applicants committed fraud on the USPTO. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:33 pm
However, the First Amendment discussion does not stop with the recognition that the plaintiffs were speaking in public. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
  Yet, Justice Breyer is apparently now the more enthusiastic anti-patent of the two; they are the only members of the Court in this century to have taken the view that the open door to § 101 patent-eligibility for “living” inventions in the Chakrabarty case should be narrowed, arguing in a dissent in J.E.M. that the utility patent law “does not apply to plants”.(1) Just last year, an anti-patent drumbeat manifested in the Breyer dissent from the… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Ferrer KINGS COUNTYWorkers' CompensationWCL §11 Does Not Shield Employer From Third- Party Liability When It Fails to Secure Insurance Garcia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Justice Alito, while ruling for California, does not join AMK's call for Apprendi's overruling. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
The relative weakness of the marks and the differences in the parties' goods led the Board to dismiss the opposition. 7-Eleven, Inc. v. [read post]