Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 7,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 11:53 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Justice Kennedy, along with Justices Thomas and Alito, joined the dissent written by Justice Scalia, who would have invalidated the law in its entirety. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Additional information on the case is available on the Lewis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
I -- I notice that in -- in the government's position you don't argue the Commerce Clause very much, and I -- we have got at Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
The majority opinion was supported by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Kennedy. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Heather Gerken
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:53 am by Lyle Denniston
That is the simple approach that Texas was seeking to have the Court embrace in Walker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Yes, there was much criticism of the endorsement test during last month's oral argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Turning back to a 1994 ruling, in Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]