Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 5461 - 5480 of 10,933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 10:02 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Please contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC today at (855) 370-2828 or find additional resources here. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of Wiebke v Wiebke and Matter of McFarland v Smith similarly held that the determination of visitation is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court, and such determination should not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Nebraska Opening Brief Tribe Brief US Brief Reply Brief TK Lower court materials and links to prior iterations of this case here. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:42 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Please contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC today at (855) 370-2828 or find additional resources here. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
And the fact that Congress adopted by statute something that the court refused to adopt as a matter of constitutional command doesn’t matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am by John Eastman
Smith, which held that religious liberty loses to mandates imposed by generally applicable laws. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:20 pm
I agree with the State that context matters, but the facts of this case do not persuade me that Smith’s comments had a tendency to incite an immediate breach of the peace by others against the police. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:19 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign finance reformers say the court has taken an important step in actually examining claims about whether an organization is independent, rather than accepting the group’s word on the matter. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:57 pm
In 1874, the Court held that purified paper pulp cellulose was not patentable subject matter, yet the Court ruled in 1980 that a genetically modified bacterium was patentable subject matter. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
MadStad sought a declaratory judgment that the “first-inventor-to-file” provision of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”), Pub. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
(It hasn’t in the twenty years that RFRA has been on the books, or in the several decades before Smith when the constitutional standard was identical.) [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:13 am by Dave Wieneke
Law Enforcement has a monopoly power in the domestic use of deadly force; courts in disposing of legal disputes and in criminal matters the ability to compel incarceration. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The matter was heard before Madam Justice Smith in the Court of Appeal on November 20, 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm by Marc Rotenberg and Alan Butler
” The Smith issue was not squarely presented because the government did not argue in either case that a search had not occurred. [read post]