Search for: "May v. May" Results 5461 - 5480 of 182,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 6:26 am by Jim Slaughter
However, even unpublished opinions give a sense of the Court’s thinking as to specific issues and how subsequent courts may rule. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 4:12 pm
An insured whose loss is less than the deductible under its insurance policy may not turn to the lease to cover those losses.Here is the case citation: Lincoln Canada Services LP v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 am
When appealing individual’s employment status all parties that may be affected must be named and servedFive Residents v Liberty CSD, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #13861If a party wishes to have the Commissioner of Education review an issue, it is critical that all parties who might be affected by the Commissioner’s decision be named in the petition. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
Individuals performing services for a public employer may be designated "non-employees" by statute Levitt v NYC Office of Collective Bargaining, 273 AD2d 104For the purposes of collective bargaining Article 14 of the Civil Service Law -- the Taylor Law -- applies to all individuals in the services of a public employer except judges, individuals in the military service and public employees designated managerial or confidential. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:07 pm
  Given the Supreme Court's recent case law, these state law rules may not be long for this world. [read post]