Search for: "Organ v. State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 23,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2021, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2001) ("romantic relationships are not protected 'recreational activities'"); State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:47 am by Sam Cohen, Steve Floyd
Japan criticized China for continuing to reject the ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
Putting aside the fact that the material scopes of the EP’s and the UN’s draft instruments bear differences, the EP´s proposal features a more ambitious choice-of-law approach, which likely reflects the EU´s condition as a “Regional integration organization”, and the (likely) bigger degree of private-international-law convergence possible within such framework. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Serafima Karkkila
This conference continues the series of workshops, seminars, and conferences in Russian law, organized by the Faculty of Law since 2008. [read post]
Further, the Order mandated employer postings in the workplace as well as compliance communications with organized labor groups. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:41 am by DONALD SCARINCI
This case arises from one of several challenges to the memorandum brought by various States, local governments, organizations, and individuals. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:20 am by Larry
The Coalition is an ad hoc group that is not a formal entity as would be, for example, a trade association organized as an entity under state and federal law. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:56 am by John Jascob
Tonkovic, J.D.A joint amicus brief has been filed by several securities industry organizations and exchanges supporting the SEC's reforms to the market data system. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]