Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 5461 - 5480 of 9,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Google Chrome EULA – Controversy over non-exclusive license clause permitting Google to use content submitted through the service: (IP Thinktank), (BriefBlog), (Copyfight), (Copyfight), (The Trademark Blog), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (IPKat), US presidential campaigns clash on patent law: (Out-Law), (IAM), (Anything… [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm by Kevin
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Airia Brands v Air Canada, 2015 ONSC 5332 [27] The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants conspired in Canada and throughout the world to fix prices of Airfreight Shipping Services, which is defined to mean airfreight cargo shipping services for shipments to or from Canada (excluding shipments to and from the United States).They emphasize that a global price fixing conspiracy is alleged. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
Rev. 1687), A Tale of Two Nations: Implementation of the Death Penalty in "Executing" Versus "Symbolic" States in the United States, by Carol S. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the government generally “has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content” (United States v Stevens, 559 US 460, 468 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:36 am by Jeff Welty
Earlier this week, I blogged about Hall v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/04/09-50113.pdf United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by David Oscar Markus
"[I]n determining whether reforms are needed, and especially in determining whether the existing guideline should be burdened with even more adjustments, the Commission should examine whether our system already provides an adequate solution for the claimed 'unacceptable' outcomes the Department complains about," Gleeson wrote in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm by AALRR
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]