Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 5461 - 5480
of 9,853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
(collectively, “Continental”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:05 am
United States, No. 12-597C (February 14, 2013). [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Newsom v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
We covered this story back in July 2013 in our blog Tales From Topical Oceans Dean had argued that "the overall look and feel of [the Avatar world] Pandora substantially resembles a Roger Dean world in that Pandora's most striking and memorable features are those created by the Plaintiff" Now United States District Judge Jesse M. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:57 am
United States, in a bid to overturn his conviction for conspiracy to commit war crimes, the single military commission conviction against Bahlul that the D.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
United States, No. 11 C 2204 (U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
In Meyer v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:51 am
,United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 12:51 pm
” Brief for United States 8; see also id., at 12. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
The 11th Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
