Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 6,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2009, 9:29 pm
In any event, even if it is applicable, it would not bar the subject demand (see Van Der Lande v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Zayed v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:42 am
As detailed in the article, the primary reasons why consumers rely upon what the salesperson tells them and fail to carefully read and understand all of the terms of the contracts they sign are due to cognitive barriers such as: (i) visual and comprehension challenges based upon the manner in which many form contracts are drafted, (ii) analytic deficiencies based upon schema deficits, (iii) positive confirmation biases, (iv) inability to imagine possible negative outcomes (i.e. the availability… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Lacy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Case 4: State of California v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
Rolls-Royce Corporation.pdf (case No. 10-3446, decided March 30, 2011). [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:58 am
A recent unpublished case, State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 12:07 pm
See Schmuck v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Blacksher spoke about the Constitutional implications of the Shelby Country v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Detective MS and Officer F. rolled down their windows "to gauge their reaction." [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Detective MS and Officer F. rolled down their windows "to gauge their reaction. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 5:52 am
In Bianchi v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
On 8 May 2012 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls and Laws LJ) gave permission to appeal in the case of Coulson v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:59 am
In the case of Winer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Brooks v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
In contrast, RPTL 704 (1)—which governs step two, filing a petition for judicial review of the assessment pursuant to RPTL article 7—provides: "Any person claiming to be aggrieved by any assessment of real property upon any assessment roll may commence a proceeding under this article by filing a petition described in section seven hundred six of this chapter in the manner set forth in [CPLR 304]" (RPTL 704 [1] [emphasis added]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
In contrast, RPTL 704 (1)—which governs step two, filing a petition for judicial review of the assessment pursuant to RPTL article 7—provides: "Any person claiming to be aggrieved by any assessment of real property upon any assessment roll may commence a proceeding under this article by filing a petition described in section seven hundred six of this chapter in the manner set forth in [CPLR 304]" (RPTL 704 [1] [emphasis added]). [read post]
