Search for: "STEVENS v. STATE"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 7,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 1:07 pm
And: Four years ago, the Supreme Court faced a similar situation in Roper v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Stevens, Salazar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:54 pm
Justice Stevens wrote that the public deliberations over a comprehensive land use plan is what saved the condemnation of Ms. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Jefferies co-authored a letter to the Guardian last Monday, stating that CFA reforms would “effectively remove the opportunity of people of ordinary means to seek redress when they have been libelled or intruded upon, or where they need to defend a libel claim”. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
The NCCI publishes an Annual Statistical Bulletin (ASB), which includes data on these 35 states plus data from all other states except those with exclusive state funds. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Steven A. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Case v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
State, Cause 14-12-01035-CR, Tex. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
(TTABlogged here).New York State Dept. of Economic Development v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
S. 745 (opinion of STEVENS, J.). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Stevens, SEC Litigation Release No. 12813 (1991). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43154 (2000) (adopting Release). 9 See, e.g., United States v. [read post]