Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 5461 - 5480 of 7,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
The petitioner in this case, Charles Andrew Fowler, killed a local police officer who had discovered him while he was preparing to rob a bank. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:40 pm by Nolan Goldberg
”) with Gucci, 2010 WL at *7 (“[T]he Court concludes that the United States interest in fully and fairly adjudicating matters before its courts . . . outweighs Malaysia’s interest in protecting the confidentiality of its banking customers’ records. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:41 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder] that under a federal witness tampering statute [18 USC § 1512(a)(1)(C) text] the government must show there was a reasonable likelihood the witness would communicate relevant information to federal officers. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:29 am by Daniel Schwartz
The Court said that even if state law held the agreement to be unconscionable as a matter of state law, "it would be incumbent upon this Court to consider the United States Supreme Court's preemption analysis in AT&T Mobility. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:29 am by Dan Schwartz
The Court said that even if state law held the agreement to be unconscionable as a matter of state law, “it would be incumbent upon this Court to consider the United States Supreme Court’s preemption analysis in AT&T Mobility. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:27 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 10-5443, involves a federal witness tampering prosecution for killing a local police officer who discovered the perpetrators preparing to rob a bank. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:29 am by Mandelman
How can ANYONE support today’s Republicans in the House of Representatives or United States Senate? [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
  [This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am by Ian Barlow, Associate
  More specifically, if the plan is governed by ERISA, the United States Code at 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
  In the criminal context, DPAs typically involve the government filing a formal charging document, usually an information, as well as the DPA with the appropriate court; NPAs typically do not involve the courts and the agreements are maintained by the parties.[9] Historically, the SEC resolved settled enforcement actions by filing consent judgments based on civil complaints in a United States District Court or an administrative order instituting proceedings and imposing… [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am by PaulKostro
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.; Bank of America Corporation; United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit; No. 09–4676; May 18, 2011 : “[A] defendant can contractually waive his right to remove an action brought in a state court. [read post]