Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 5461 - 5480 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:35 pm by Jim Walker
Carnival, the United States Supreme Court required a passenger who lived in Oregon, and injured during a cruise from California to Mexico, to file suit here in Miami. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
" The Court focused on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in the ruling this month, a bill that extends the time period in which employees can pursue equal compensation lawsuits, and restores the law that existed for years in regions all over the United States, including Southern California, prior to the Ledbetter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31758 (ND NY, March 9, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Rastafarian inmate that he was permitted to wear his crown (a religious head covering) only in his cell and housing unit, and not outside of these areas.In Peele v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 6/9/09Cite: The Clorox Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am by Florian Mueller
Apple has very high shares in the smartphone, tablet, or smart watch markets in the United States, the geography the lawsuit focuses on, and does not allow other payment apps (particularly "wallet" apps) to use the iPhone's NFC chip. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
 The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the dismissal holding that patent '545 did not claim patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am by Steve Kalar
United States, 570 U.S. 254, 258, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]