Search for: "State v. David." Results 5461 - 5480 of 14,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
David Stone handled issues and their parallel US comparison. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Payne in Mobile Equity Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am by ecooper
As David Cohen and Carole Joffe poignantly document, abortion patients already face an obstacle course when seeking care. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Justice David Souter led the charge, repeatedly couching the asserted "burdens" on Judge Margarita Lopez Torres as burdens on her ability to influence the ultimate decision makers, not burdens on her ability to access the electoral process. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Eugene Volokh
A later court decision fortunately reversed this order, which was clearly unconstitutional; and Wednesday the Massachusetts high court (Van Liew v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:07 pm
The ACLU won in state district court, lost in the Colorado Court of Appeals, and the case is now before the Colorado Supreme Court, as Taxpayers for Public Education v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am by David Post
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Packingham v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
As David Hyman notes, this is a war of anecdotes. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The issue in the appeal was whether a foreign state whose agents remotely install spyware on claimants in the UK, causing psychiatric injury to those being spied upon, is entitled to immunity from civil proceedings within the meaning of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978. [read post]