Search for: "State v. Eugene"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 5,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm
The judge dismissed the piracy charges, citing U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
Can one abhor the eugenics language of Buck v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:35 pm
The WSJ Law Blog excerpts this part of the opinion in American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
Today the Tenth Circuit told the state of Utah that it could no longer erect crosses by the side of the highway memorializing state troopers who have died. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Several readers asked me why United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The Detroit News reports (thanks to Prof. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:45 am
First, as Eugene Kontorovich has already noted, the Smith holding simply states that robbery is piracy (all that was necessary under the facts of that case); it doesn’t say that only robbery is piracy. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:11 pm
by Julian Ku In the first U.S. court opinion on piracy since 1820, a U.S. judge in Norfolk, Virginia has dismissed piracy charges against Somali defendants in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm
Eugene Kontorovich passes along the news about United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The 2-to-1 decision, came in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:35 am
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
But a general ban on speech that seems to promote the use of firearms would be unconstitutional (see the highlighted passage in R.A.V. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:59 am
(Eugene Volokh) United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE Appellant Eugene Christopher Banks was initially committed as an SDP by the district court in 1998. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:51 am
The Department is already defending the constitutionality of DOMA in Gill v. [read post]
