Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5461 - 5480 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 9:03 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The substance of the case involved the court’s applying — for the first time — the doctrine of equitable tolling to excuse a late filing by a state prisoner in a habeas case. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
The question newly added in the petition is a sequel to the Court’s ruling two years ago in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am by Wells Bennett
Broadly, the government highlights the practical difficulties associated with combating a non-state actor in the twenty-first century. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am by Michael Crowell
First to be converted were superior court judges in 1998, then district judges in 2002, and finally appellate judges in 2004. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:50 am by SHG
Via Eugene Volokh at WaPo Conspiracy, the 9th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After defendant’s plea and before imposition of his sentence, the court has reviewed documents from BM’s case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After defendant’s plea and before imposition of his sentence, the court has reviewed documents from BM’s case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:51 am by Ken White
The standard for the United States District Court for the District of Maryland — where Kimberlin is currently vexing his critics with bogus claims — is representative: Under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
In recent weeks, four federal and state appellate courts have vacated district court decisions that denied motions to compel arbitration. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:22 am by Larisa Vaysman
The Court said that the “purpose” of § 1133 was “that the claimant be notified of the reasons for the denial of the claim and have a fair opportunity for review,” and interpreted this to apply to judicial review (quoting Kent v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
On August 5, 2010, after the state court litigation commenced, a claims representative for the insurer sent counsel for Davis and Maxwell a letter stating that in light of the policy’s Insured v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One case settled quickly; two district courts reached decision that defendant’s use was fair. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]