Search for: "State v. State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 258,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm by ALeonard
This was apparently influenced as well by a recent New York State Appellate Division ruling in Hoffman v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
(Even if the officer can recite “Miranda Warnings” by heart, and most can, they are not infrequently advised to read them from a printed card, primarily to avoid any dispute over dropped words or phrases, however inadvertent.)The June 30, 2010, Oregon Court of Appeals case, State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 am
Central Bedforshire Council v Housing Action Zone Ltd and others (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 613; [2009] WLR (D) 232 “In determining whether a decision by a local authority to seek possession of land where there were unauthorised occupiers was reasonable, the county court could look at a series [...] [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
R (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Case C-388/07); [2009] WLR(D) 82 “National rules allowing compulsory dismissal at retirement age and non-recruitment of persons of retirement age were not contrary to Community law provided that they were justified by legitimate social [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:48 am
Regina (Age UK) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission and Another intervening) Queen’s Bench Division “Provisions permitting an employer to require retirement at the age of 65 were justified where he could show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim since the government had [...] [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 8:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA (2016) Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States. [read post]