Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 40,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying dispute concerned an… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
From United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
But a new Seventh Circuit decision from just last week, United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
[Some interesting words from Justice Douglas.] [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:09 pm
” [at [205]] PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52 (19 April 2011) Related posts:Canadian Case on State Immunity In Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:22 am
Instead, we get this passage (with cites to Calise v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
State; May v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
In state court, the traditional Pennsylvania version (based on Azzarello v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
When a constitutional provision applies only to citizens, it uses that very word, as in the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which prevents states from denying various rights to "citizens" of other states but not noncitizens. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm
This freedom has of course been jealously guarded in the United States, where it is constitutionally enshrined in the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
Put Clarke v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2014). [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
Zier v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
& Alkermes Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:17 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 - Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co.
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:20 am
Collins v. [read post]
