Search for: "States v. State"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 258,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:25 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
It's . . . not good.When an attorney's brief is so bad that the appeal gets dismissed, and the client thereby injured, my take is that the attorney should generally be sanctioned and/or reported to the State Bar.Yet the panel here apparently does neither.This is not an attorney who's just started practicing law. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:33 am
Read the opinion The post DAVID BOYD, ET UX. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:25 am
Read the opinion The post ROBERT EDWARDS v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
” See State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Chevron v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:55 am
Unlike Chevron, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
V. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:23 am
The appeal is dismissed and resolution of this case will be delayed.The case is Zivkovic v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:33 am
That order perhaps gives the SEC some temporary relief but under the applicable rules, the Eighth Circuit will have an opportunity to decide whether to re-instate the stay of the regulation (Liberty Energy Incorporated v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
Accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action alleging legal malpractice against the law firm defendants (see Shaya B. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:28 am
However, equal division is not always equitable, as in Smith v. [read post]