Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 5,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Town of Greenburgh, No. 06-4897 "In an action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant-town and two municipal officers is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's desire to use town's community center was not protected by his right to freedom of movement; 2) plaintiff's speech was not silenced or chilled by defendant's allegedly punitive conduct; and 3) probable cause supported the arrest and prosecution of… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
Some towns, however, avoid that liability by enacting an ordinance that shifts the responsibility for maintaining the sidewalk from the town to the abutting landowner.In Rivers V. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:07 pm
Gordon has also publicly stated that the sweeps are interfering with the work of undercover city police officers and federal agents. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
Town of Plymouth, No. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:17 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 8:31 am
New York State Dept. of Education [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
The state has agreed to pay 90 percent of the cost, and the town's share could be determined this month, Town Manager Milton Otero said. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
I think we can now officially say that Justice Scalia is, historically speaking, delusional.His recent Giles v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:45 pm
Maybe I'm stating the obvious here. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
But there are also several legal points that the majority does not address.In Brenwick Associates LLC and Town of Whitestown, Indiana v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:12 am
Supreme Court's landmark school-desegregation decision of Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:29 pm
Matter of Woodland Community Association v Planning Board of Town of Shandaken This article 78 appeal was brought against a judgment dismissing petitioners’ application to review a determination of respondent Planning Board of the Town of Shandaken granting respondent Good Water Corporation’s application for site plan approval and a special use permit. [read post]
