Search for: "Tenant 1"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 6,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 10:12 am
Parameswaran Pillai (2000(1) SCC 712) and Baldev Singh & Ors. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:47 am
Escort Ltd. [(1986) 1 SCC 264].In ABL International Ltd. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:12 am
At first instance it was held that the tenants had been in adverse possession for over twelve years and that the applicants’ title had been extinguished before October 2000. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:51 am
1 of the RTA. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:21 am
— and we invite you to discuss the new partners at your firm….Welcome to the partnership.Let’s look at the new partner classes at the top 10 most prestigious law firms, as ranked by our friends at Vault:1. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:03 am
While showing the basement of the building to a prospective tenant, plaintiff's building manager discovered that the doorway leading into the basement was sagging. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Ofulues appealed on the basis that the law on adverse possession constituted a breach of Article 1, Protocol 1,and Art 6, and further that i) the Bosserts had acknowledged that they were tenants in a defence to possession proceedings in 1990, and ii) that the Bosserts had acknowledged title (so as to re-start time) in a without prejudice letter of 1992. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Ofulues appealed on the basis that the law on adverse possession constituted a breach of Article 1, Protocol 1,and Art 6, and further that i) the Bosserts had acknowledged that they were tenants in a defence to possession proceedings in 1990, and ii) that the Bosserts had acknowledged title (so as to re-start time) in a without prejudice letter of 1992. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Ofulues appealed on the basis that the law on adverse possession constituted a breach of Article 1, Protocol 1,and Art 6, and further that i) the Bosserts had acknowledged that they were tenants in a defence to possession proceedings in 1990, and ii) that the Bosserts had acknowledged title (so as to re-start time) in a without prejudice letter of 1992. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 11:29 pm
Here are a few general tips. 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:42 pm
The mall is almost 190,000 square feet and features Polo Ralph Lauren, Eddie Bauer, Nike Clearance Store, and VF Outlet (parent company of brands such as Nautica, Jansport and Wrangler) as among its largest tenants. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:15 am
McGee attacks some of the fundamental tenants of mainstream conceptions of the role of tax. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan, Court of Appeal, December 9, 2010 (Elias LJ, Norris J, Lawtel note only) Vertigan was the assured shorthold tenant of the claimant. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan, Court of Appeal, December 9, 2010 (Elias LJ, Norris J, Lawtel note only) Vertigan was the assured shorthold tenant of the claimant. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan, Court of Appeal, December 9, 2010 (Elias LJ, Norris J, Lawtel note only) Vertigan was the assured shorthold tenant of the claimant. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:11 pm
The Notice to Quit is the Notice terminating the tenancy, and must give the tenant not less than 1 month from the next rental payment becoming due before the lease is terminated. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
In light of this absolute tenant right, how could the landlord possibly be held responsible? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am
The claim under Art. 6 did not need to be considered ([53]-[56]) and the complaint under Art. 1, Protocol 1 was inadmissible as it hadn’t been raised before ([57]-[59]) There is a fly in my Borscht Well, what to make of this? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:25 am
Obviously landlords of HMOs will benefit from the increased numbers of tenants looking for available rooms but what about the landlords who will have tenants who can no longer afford the rent because of the cuts? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellant Division's decision, please use this link: Ever-Win, Inc. v. 1-10 Industry Assoc., LLC [read post]
