Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5461 - 5480 of 8,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm by Miriam Seifter
  The United States, participating as an amicus supporting reversal, takes a middle ground. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:49 am by McGlinchey Stafford PLLC
  Pointing to CAFA, the petitioner removed the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
E-3 principal nonimmigrant aliens must be coming to the United States solely to perform services in a “specialty occupation”. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Wells Bennett
The Government’s argument mischaracterizes the Emergency Motion and misapprehends the structure of Section 7(a), which provided: (1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant. . . . (2) Except as provided in… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Eric Lorber
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia resolved a “turf war” between two federal agencies claiming regulatory authority over futures markets for natural gas. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Petitioner filed a CEQA petition for writ of mandate which was denied by the trial court. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm by Wells Bennett
 The United States denied this and insisted that Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2009 barred jurisdiction over al-Madhwani’s claims in any event. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
United States, a case pending in the First Circuit that I posted about in December and in an debate last spring with today’s most tireless free speech advocate, David Cole. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Irina Tarsis
This year, the Supreme Court of the United States may (or may not) grant a writ to hear a case involving Nazi-era looted art for the first time in almost a decade. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 12:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In that petition she alleged that, after she fled without the children to the United States in 1999 to escape domestic violence, the petitioner took their children from her mother's home without her permission and obtained a default order of custody from a court in the Dominican Republic. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 11:01 am
The petitioner, Richard Manno & Co., Inc. manufactures and distributes steel fasteners and machined parts, with a market covering much of the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
There are two ways in which you may file your I-600: Filing in the U.S. at the National Benefits' Center - NBC - (Department of Homeland Security/United State's Citizenship and Immigration Services) or in country (this may be at USCIS foreign office within an Embassy or with a U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:06 pm by Ray Dowd
  This is an important opportunity for the US Supreme Court to review the issue of Nazi-looted art in the United States, an issue that has created disarray in our federal courts and has pitted state law against such federal laws as the National Stolen Property Act 18 USC 2314.My firm represents the petitioner and I am counsel of record. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm by Pamela Wolf
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:45 pm by Charles Rubin
”  Applying this test, the Court found that:we believe that even though petitioner's golf play and personal services performed in the United States has some connection to his U.S. image rights, income from the sale of such image rights is not predominantly attributable to his performance in the United States. [read post]