Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 21,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
This 55-page opinion from the Ninth Circuit tells you probably more than you would ever want to know about soybean farming (and cotton farming) in the United States -- and, in particular, (1) how we get rid of weeds in modern farming, and (2) just how dependent we are on both (a) Round-Up and its follow-on chemicals (here, dicamba) and (b) genetically modified seeds that protect crops against such chemicals. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:10 am
The court stated: We will not second-guess FINRA’s decision that there was not good cause to extend the deadline. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
United States, 12-884, involving state authority in the field of immigration, without comment beyond a one-line notation that “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is TruePosition, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm
Costco argues that goods manufactured abroad can still fall within this phrase whereas Omega argues that goods manufactured abroad are not "made under this title" unless the goods are made or sold with permission from the copyright owner to import the goods into the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:57 am
" The stated purpose for this change was to facilitate duty-free returns to the United States of goods that had been leased to a government or service industry. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 12:03 pm
Priest, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 564, 570, 45 C.M.R. 338, 344 (1972).See United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:56 am
A case yesterday decided by the United States District Court of Connecticut highlights that distinction.In Charles v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
State v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 11:21 pm
., United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
United States, 715 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:53 am
Narita Export LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:28 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:28 pm
United States, 91 Fed. [read post]
