Search for: "United States v. Herring"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 23,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2010, 4:20 am
State, 2010 Del. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
In January 2008, Staff Management fired Jimenez because she did not have authorization to legally work in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
United States by Carol M. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
From the onset of United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Ceballos—a 2006 United States Supreme Court decision—does not apply in the setting of public employees who are teachers and scholars. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:24 pm
Garcia did not, as a final barrier to her copyright claim, fix her work in any tangible form; a requisite element under copyright in the United States for an interest in the work to arise. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:40 am
She got one, and she got convicted.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am
They show the truth of the old adage that bad facts make bad law.The first is United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
In Fix v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:01 am
This post summarizes decisions released by the United States Supreme Court on May 17, 2021. [read post]
