Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 6,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 8:44 pm
” The judge said that argument also had been advanced to try to maintain the ban on interracial marriage, struck down by the Supreme Court in Loving v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:55 am
The upcoming SCOTUS decisions on the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (denying federal benefits to same-sex couples that are legally married in their states) and California’s Proposition 8 (a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage), in addition to their potentially profound personal significance to persons on all sides of the marriage debate, will no doubt provide rich fodder for human rights jurists. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, July 12, 2016. [1] Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:30 pm
V. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
King once was pastor, and to think about Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:51 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:49 pm
Judge Kethledge wrote for the unanimous panel in King v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:01 am
Supreme Court dealt a blow to public unions in June,” in Janus v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
" * Immediately saving lives by effectively repealing Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2004, 12:05 pm
"[1] In Blakely v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:38 am
A 2015 poll conducted by the International Council of Shopping Centers found that 62% of registered voters were not aware that use taxes were payable (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Under the facts of this hypothetical case (stylized as McCain v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am
Emily Birnbaum of The Hill covers recent polling by CSPAN indicating than more than half of likely U.S. voters cannot name a Supreme Court justice. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
V, pp. 17-22, 44-53, 58-64, 184-187, 212-214; a selection can also be found here at 208-213.) [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:00 am
No. 06-0173. [6-1022] PHELAN-RUDEN v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
v=0Yi-LvnM_5M Don’t make Iowa a place for American Idiot! [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm
” That a supposedly local economic activity would be beyond the reach of congress is an issue that was settled in Wickard v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 10:01 pm
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of State of Missouri ex rel, Koster v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:35 pm
Everyone who doesn't sign is, essentially, counted once (as signature-gatherers try to reach a number equivalent to a certain proportion of the total voters). [read post]
