Search for: "Welling v. Welling"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 110,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Such has been the fate of U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
This moggy has been kept busy over the last 24 hours with matters of partiality at the EPO, Swiss form claims, and Bolar exemption in UK and under unitary patent, and then, no sooner was he thinking of emerging from the deluge, fellow Kat Annsley kindly drew his attention to the eagerly awaited substantive decision in the case of Actavis v Lilly (as we shall call it for short - you may wish to call it Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511 (Pat) (15 May… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:02 pm
See Knipe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:29 pm
Such a case was described in a recent decision, Thorstrom v Thorstrom, in which a woman owned two adjacent parcels in Fort Bragg. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 2:17 pm
Well now. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 3:19 pm
Suvini v Anderson, Staines County Court, 13 August 2010 It is well known that notices under section 21(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 must give notice to a tenant that “after a date specified … being the last day of a period of the tenancy … possession of the dwelling-house is required”. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:06 pm
Several days ago, I posted about a Ninth Circuit decision, Barnes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 4:38 am
Why Wolverine should never scratch his nose…Marvel Enterprises, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Ullman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
Particularly if both parents are working far from home, it might well be that the parents take the kids with them and place them locally. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:29 am
On April 13, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued for publication a per curiam opinion in Duray Development, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:56 am
Louis V. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:40 am
In the 2009 case of Hernon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:43 pm
Mcintyre Machinery v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop in this one. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:13 pm
The German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) recently had to decide on the legality of a trade mark parody that 'in its overall impression' was based on an earlier well-known trade mark; (decision of 2 April 2015 - I ZR 59/13 - Springender Pudel).The oriignalThe claimant was the leading sports article manufacturer Puma, who owns the well-known German word-device trade mark for the word element "PUMA" combined with the outline of a jumping puma. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
When it interviewed G.T.S. in camera, it found him to be delightful and mature as well. [read post]
