Search for: "v. Smith" Results 5461 - 5480 of 16,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Two Commons Committees – the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – have recently held evidence sessions with government Ministers discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Theodore N. Mirvis
  As contemplated in our April 2022 memorandum, Delaware has now adopted important amendments to Delaware’s General Corporation Law that would expand the right of a corporation to adopt an “exculpation” provision in its certificate of incorporation to cover not only directors (as has been allowed and widely adopted since 1986, following Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund “A”, etc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am by Holly
February 23, 2024 |  By: Thomas Dunlap   The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in Wendy Smith et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
  ***************************************************     In Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by Peter Hirtle
  As Kevin Smith noted in an earlier posting on the case, if 109 does not apply to books manufactured abroad, it raises the issue of whether libraries can legally lend foreign items. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
 Whether you have a right to an attorney (at your own expense) before being removed from the United States.The voting line-up is also not surprising given the panel draw.Judge Bybee, joined by Judge Randy Smith, believes that non-citizens who are caught in the United States and subjected to expedited removal proceedings are not entitled to hire a lawyer at their own expense to defend themselves in those proceedings.Judge Pregerson dissents, and believes that they possess such a right… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
  That case, from 2014, was written by Judge Watford, and joined by Judges (Willie) Fletcher and (Milan) Smith. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:27 pm
  Because fake marriages don't deserve a truth-defeating privilege.And, yeah, if that means that we eventually run the risk of having to figure out whether, say, 26-year old Anna Nicole Smith's marriage to her 89-year old billionaire husband Howard Marshall was also a "sham" -- well, we can cross that bridge when we come to it. [read post]