Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5481 - 5500 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2012, 5:53 am by immigrationprof
Times Opinionater expressed these bottom line observations aboyt the arguments before the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:22 am by Sam Favate
iStock The Justice Department may currently be engaged in a fight with Arizona over immigration policy – which recently went before the Supreme Court – but it’s not exactly giving other states a pass while the country waits to hear what the court has to say on that matter. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:57 am by immigrationprof
Supreme Court allows the mandatory police verification of immigration status of "suspicious" persons under Arizona's S.B. 1070 to go into effect? [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:45 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Last month the Supreme Court capped off a blockbuster term with oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:27 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Following recent high-profile appearances before the Supreme Court, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:54 am by Richard Renner
  The MSPB recognizes that it does not have authority to review the security determinations themselves, respecting the Supreme Court's decision in Department of Navy v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:03 am by Cormac Early
Bullock, the challenge to the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding a statute that bans corporate spending in state elections. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:14 am by Isaac Gorodetski
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
  But at the state level, the truly Draconian sentences — five years ago, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in a case where an Arizona man had received a 200-year sentence for child porn — are largely the result of some judges imposing “max and stack” consecutive sentences. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:25 pm by lawmrh
Under Arizona Supreme Court Rule 32(d) and (l) and the Court’s administrative authority, costs and expenses are imposed in lawyer disciplinary proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:47 pm by Bart Torvik
The oral argument at the Supreme Court over Arizona's immigration enforcement law has "utterly depress[ed]" Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times.Not, she tells us, because the Court seems poised to uphold the law (which she presumably disfavors on policy grounds). [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:08 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Cullen v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:49 am by Stephen Wermiel
Several alumni of the office have found their way on to the current Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am by Nabiha Syed
Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy reports that the Kentucky Supreme Court has issued its decision on remand from the Court’s decision last Term in Kentucky v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:24 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
That law was challenged by the Obama administration and was taken up last week by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Marissa Miller
” At the Blog of the Legal Times, Tony Mauro has coverage of Thursday’s reception at the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute, “the annual company picnic of the Court community. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:28 pm by Associated Press
Supreme Court may uphold parts of Arizona's immigration law, legislators and activists across the country say they are gearing up to push for similar get-tough measures in their states. [read post]