Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 5481 - 5500 of 10,932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
The process is being implemented under California Rule of Court 8.70, with exemptions under Rule 8. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:13 am by Joe May
California – Billboard Firm to Put Up Signs Backing Six L.A. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:24 pm
We are dedicated to providing our clients the best family law advice and representation in southern California, and particularly in the Indio, Joshua Tree, and Riverside Courts! [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
State courts say “no,” but most federal courts in California are saying “yes. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Todd Aagaard
In ONEOK, the central issue is whether the Federal Power Act or state antitrust laws govern the activities of natural gas traders who manipulated the market for gas during the 2000-01 California electricity crisis. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
Going forward, in California state courts, employees will not be barred by representative action waivers from pursuing PAGA claims. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:55 am by Legal Profession Prof
The California State Bar Court Review Department has recommended a two-year suspension with a minimum of nine months actual suspension and the balance stayed on probation conditions. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:41 am
Nevada, Wyoming and Michigan have barred the deduction of downstream field costs by statute. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
An independent claim under California’s UCL is therefore barred so long as MLB’s activities are lawful under the antitrust laws. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 am by John McFarland
Nevada, Wyoming and Michigan have barred the deduction of downstream field costs by statute. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:56 am by Tom Goldstein
  They probably will also win the sweeping claim that bars to same-sex marriage are unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  That was the inequitable situation in California after the state supreme court interpreted Proposition 8 to bar future marriages of same-sex couples but to leave untouched ones entered before the measure was approved by voters. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
The City, seeking approval of the move, filed suit against MLB, alleging violations of state and federal antitrust laws, of California’s consumer protection statute, and of California tort law. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm by Steve Sanders
  As Michael Klarman writes, they arose from “fierce political backlash” against a few early, favorable state court rulings for marriage equality. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:09 pm
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]