Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 5481 - 5500 of 31,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
—In this section: (1) The term “eligible child” means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The New Jersey Supreme Court faced this question in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit has used a child abuse case to clarify the rules guiding when the district courts may release private information about non-party witnesses. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:42 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The state created an appointed attorneys program six years ago after the 2013 case of DeWolfe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:09 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
II (Indian Child Welfare Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2020.htmlCarsetti v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Nomenclature note: as I mentioned in my previous post, the bill uses the term “child sexual abuse material,” or CSAM, instead of the historical term “child pornography. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
.'” The inclusion of this requirement in the legislation originally was controversial because Carter did not seem to require it (see here, here and here, for example); nevertheless, it was included and doctors have interpreted the term differently as a result of an Ontario Superior Court decision that the term does not mean that death must be imminent (see A.B. v Canada (Attorney General), at para. 79; also see here). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:27 am by Katherine Robinson
If children are sharing time between parents, there is the ability to determine the amount of child support payable by applying the analysis developed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Contino v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:53 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
A whopping 23 years ago almost to the day, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case called Reno v. [read post]